Sunday, June 20, 2010

750 Words: My Daily Mind Dump

I didn’t initially accept it when I was officially diagnosed with ADD in the mid-oughts. (How the hell did we let an entire decade pass without giving it a name?)

I was familiar with the stereotype of ADD as the bane of elementary school teachers, and God knows there were ADD kids when I was I school. But I had never been a disciplinary problem for my teachers, and my grades had always been above average. I was laid back to the point of lethargy.

My therapist explained that I was that rare exception to the rule. I was one of the relatively few kids who experienced the attention deficit disorder component without the accompanying hyperactivity disorder component. Because I wasn’t bouncing off the walls like the true ADD/HDers, nobody suspected what was going on in my brain. My attention was scattered among competing stimuli much of the time, but I’d been gifted with enough innate reading ability and a sufficiently retentive memory (you do not want to sit next to me watching Jeopardy; I will always be right, and I will annoy the hell out of you) that I was able to make it through my classes without difficulty. And when I went on to college, the coursework in my liberal arts majors frankly wasn’t all that challenging.

Once I accepted that I was an ADDult, though, it was kind of a relief. Not only did it explain my tendency to flit among tasks without making much progress on any of them, it also explained some of my social awkwardness in groups. When I’m sitting next to you at a table in a banquet hall, the reason I might not seem fully involved in our conversation is that I’m trying to follow every conversation at the table . . . and also trying not to follow those. I can’t help myself.

The diagnosis helped, as did coaching and medication. The very first day I took the med I finally settled on (Strattera) and took my dog for a walk, I realized that I was walking down the sidewalk and looking at the scenery and listening to the birds and the traffic and not thinking about everything I had to do during the coming day. Wow!

But despite the capsules and the meditation that I’ve been practicing for going on three years now, it’s still not uncommon for me to find myself inexplicably all keyed up in the morning. On those days, I’m as likely as not to simultaneously embark on three or four tasks at the same time. Not a recipe for success.

What I needed was a daily mind dump. Rather than me explaining the concept, let’s have Buster Benson explain it:
I’ve long been inspired by an idea I first learned about in The Artist's Way called morning pages. Morning pages are three pages of writing done every day, typically encouraged to be in "long hand", typically done in the morning, that can be about anything and everything that comes into your head. It's about getting it all out of your head, and is not supposed to be edited or censored in any way. The idea is that if you can get in the habit of writing three pages a day, that it will help clear your mind and get the ideas flowing for the rest of the day. Unlike many of the other exercises in that book, I found that this one actually worked and was really really useful.
Buster (if that’s indeed his name . . . he claims to have previously gone by the monikers Buster McLeod and Erik Benson) created a Web site named 750words.com specifically for the use of himself and others in mind dumping. (The name comes from his estimate that three handwritten pages equal about 750 words.)

For the past 2+ months, I’ve maintained a blog on that Web site. Unlike other blogs I’ve created and then largely neglected (ufriendly.blogspot.com and 1stepatatime.tumblr.com), my 750 Words blog is unpublished. Nobody can access it unless they know my Gmail user name and password.

And unlike my private blogs, I don’t put a lot of effort into prettying up the text. I just start typing. If I notice I’ve made a typo, I fix it. Other than that, I don’t do any editing.
I just type, usually until I’m congratulated for completing my 750 words (which usually takes about 30 minutes unless I’m interrupted). I can type more if I choose, or less. I can even skip a day.

But once I’m done, with the entry, I’m done with the entry. I don’t even look at what I’ve written. I just leave the site and don’t return to it until the following day.
For the remainder of the day, I could theoretically go in and edit that day’s text (but I don’t). I can call up and look at my entries for previous days, but I can’t edit them.

Buster’s Web site provides some tools for me to analyze my entries. I can easily determine that my posting for June 14th:
  • was 786 words long;
  • that I began writing at 9:47a and averaged 25 words/minute over 31 minutes of essentially uninterrupted input;
  • that I was feeling mostly upset, as compared to self-important, self-expressive, anxious, or affectionate;
  • that I was mostly concerned with success (closely followed by death), as compared to religion, leisure, or eating/drinking;
  • that I was writing about the past;
  • that my primary sense was hearing; and
  • that I was way more concerned about myself than anyone else.
Those bells and whistles must interest Buster, but they aren’t why I’m using 750 words. The exercise simply works for me. I find that, once I’ve typed in my entry for the day, my mind is clearer than it had been. Not only do I have the satisfaction of having already accomplished something fairly early in the day, whatever shards had remained of what my brain had been processing in my sleep have either been brought to the surface or else banished to cyberspace.

If you use (or even test-drive) 750 Words, let me now what you think.

Submitted to the AIRS Newsletter 6/19/10 for my User-Friendly column



Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Soluto: A Tool for Speeding Up Boot-Time

God only knows how many programs I install or uninstall every year. Over the ~four years I've owned my Dell Dimension laptop, the registry that controls Windows XP SP3 has probably been tied into knots.

Most of the time, this doesn't cause major problems. Every few months, I experience some really scary lockup that gives me that sinking Oh, shit . . . what have I done to myself now? sensation. But I've always managed (so far, at least) to work my way back out of the hole that I've dug myself into.

But one of the results of all my tinkering is that my machine takes what feels like an inordinate amount of time to boot up. I periodically go through my startup programs to see what can be disabled (despite my best efforts, some of those programs seem to insist on installing as autostart programs), and I've got the machine programmed to periodically defrag its drive.

But the machine still takes way too long to get running.

Last week, I ran across a new program that's helped somewhat. It's called Soluto, and it's billed as anti-frustration software. Officially launched on May 24th at the TechCrunch Disrupt event, the product purports to:
allow PC users to understand their boot and discover which applications are
slowing them down. Soluto Beta not only cuts down your boot, it also
improves your ongoing PC performance for you.

The product looks promising. After I installed the program and rebooted, Soluto Beta loaded during my reboot and, after I was fully up, gave me a list of applications that were loading during bootup. The applications were grouped into three categories:
  • applications which could probably be disabled from autostarting
  • apps which I might want to consider disabling
  • essential apps which I ought not to mess with
Within each category, I was presented with information about each app's purpose and given an opportunity to change its status. By making a few judicious choices, I was able to pare my start time down from 4:05 to 2:50. Still too long, but better.

Soluto Beta keeps track of the changes one makes, and one has the opportunity to go back and undo any change that appears in retrospect to evoke that Oh, shit! feeling.

It's worth trying.

But if you do decide to give Soluto Beta a try, make sure you're downloading it from the official http://www.soluto.com/ site. With all the publicity surrounding the product's winning 1st place in the Disrupt event, reports have surfaced that malware distributors have begun disguising their own nefarious products as Soluto.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Misplaced the Damned Phone Again

When I moved from a 3-bedroom Colonial to a 1-bedroom apartment, I figured it would be a win-win situation. Not only would I be forced to own much less stuff, there would be far fewer places in which I could misplace stuff.

That included my cellphone.

But it still happens from time to time. And since I no longer have a landline, dialing my cell number from the landline and wandering around following the ringing sound is no longer an option.

Luckily, there's another option. Free Web service http://www.wheresmycellphone.com/ permits me to type in my cell number and then calls that number.

Problem solved . . . unless I've also misplaced my laptop.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Adding MOVE TO and COPY TO Commands to the Context Menu

File management can be unnecessarily tedious. Here's what I mean. In order to copy a file from my flash drive to my hard drive, I need to:


  1. Launch My Computer or Windows Explorer
  2. Navigate to the flash drive
  3. Right click on the desired file.
  4. Select Copy from the context menu
  5. Navigate to the desired destination
  6. Right click
  7. Select Paste from the context menu
All of that is fine, but I end up with the destination location in the My Computer or Windows Explorer window. If I want to copy other files from the flash drive to a different destination location, I've first got to navigate back to the flash drive. Not only does this waste time, it interferes with my (limited) attention span.

The good folks at the O'Reilly network provide two nifty registry hacks for adding Move To and Copy To options to the context menu.

www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/excerpt/winxphacks_chap1/index1.html

This definitely works on my Windows XP system with Service Pack 2 installed. When I choose either of the two new options from the context menu, a dialog box opens up permitting me to browse to the destination location. After the move or copy operation completes, I'm still back where I started in the source location.

Still, it's a registry hack. Accordingly, I created a system restore point before performing it.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Setting Windows XP to Shut Down at a Specified Time

Ever need to leave your PC running while some task completes but regret leaving it running all night? There’s a little-known shutdown com­mand program buried in Windows XP. Because it doesn’t seem to be docu­mented anywhere, most users are unaware of it. Here’s how to use it (and it's far easier to do than it is to explain).

  1. Launch Scheduled Tasks by click­ing on Start Programs Accessories System Tools Scheduled Tasks.
  2. Click on Add Scheduled Task and then on Next.
  3. Using the Browse button, browse to select file C:\Windows\System32\Shutdown.exe.
  4. Once the file name and path appear in the Run dialog box, append a space and –s to the end. Without that added switch, when the scheduled task runs Windows will patiently wait for you to specify whether you want to shut down, restart, log off, or cancel.
  5. Accept the default name for the task or select a different one.
  6. Follow the prompts to specify when Windows should shut down the PC.
  7. Provide your login password, then confirm it. (Tasks set through the scheduled tasks applet won’t run from an account which doesn’t have a password.)
  8. After checking the Open advanced properties checkbox, click on Finish.
  9. In the Advanced Properties prop­erty sheet, click on the Settings tab. Check the Only start the scheduled task if the computer has been idle for checkbox, specify a time inter­val (the default 10 minutes is good). Also check the Stop the task if the computer ceases to be idle check­box, then click on Apply. (This is your insurance against your PC shutting down on you should you be working late on evening.)



Should you want to tweak the task in the future or delete it, just launch the Scheduled Tasks applet again and dou­ble-click the task to edit it. Should you want to disable it, uncheck the Enabled checkbox on the Tasks tab.

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Low Tech Hottie

We use them every day . . . and we hate them. Desktop staplers just don't reliably do the job. And it's no wonder . . . their fundamental design hasn't changed for the past 50 years.

Until now.

The desktop stapler has been created by (who else?) Staples.

The Staples One-Touch Stapler with Staple Gun Power is nothing short of amazing. Tapping the thing with one finger will cleanly drive a standard staple through 20 sheets of paper. That's what the ads claim, but my guess is that it will handle 25-30 sheets.

No cord. No batteries. No teflon-coated titanium staples. No pounding. Just an ergonomic design that does magical things with leverage.

Trust me. You'll never spend $14.99 more wisely. Check out the demo at the Web site.

Friday, November 12, 2004

Rein In Those MS Word RTF Files with Embedded Images

It's always perplexed me how huge Word documents can become when images are embedded in them. It doesn't seem to happen when files are saved in the default .DOC format--only when they're saved in the .RTF format.

An item on p. 79 of the 11/20/04 PC Magazine gave me the answer. Two copies of each image are saved within an .RTF file, including one in the bloated Windows Metafile (WMF) format.

There's a simple registry tweak to prevent Word from creating the WMF copy. If you don't have access to the issue (which doesn't appear to be online yet), check out Microsoft's Knowledgebase Article 224663.

The tweak works. I had a user manual with a lot of screenshots which was over 300 MB and took forever to load. After applying the registry tweak, I opened the file, made a tiny edit to it, and saved it . . . as an 8 MB file.